Why a shortage of quality coaches is leaving England
behind the rest.
We ask continually why we don’t have a large
pool of talented youngsters and wonder what the problem is. The problem is the
obvious; the teachers of the game are not good enough. This can also be applied
to teaching in schools, where a level of mediocrity is producing uneducated and
unskilled youths who are not able to contribute to society efficiently. We
blame society and culture on the failings of the young generation and yet fail look
at is the standards of teaching in schools and in sports. If you get the
foundations right with anything then the structure will be stable and solid. We must blame ourselves though; we have allowed a culture of apathy
which accepts poor standards. We believe that there is a problem with our
children when in fact there is a problem with our teaching standards.
We are failing kids by allowing mediocre
coaches to educate them. Between the ages of 7-11 a child’s neuromuscular development
is 95% grown, this means that what they learn between these years will be
fundamental to what they become as adults. This is the age where if the
foundations are laid down correctly, with correct technique, skill and
importantly values of how to play and of how to be a good person, a child will
have a greater chance of progressing in their sport.
The most important age group for development is
between 7-11; based on this you would assume that the best coaches should be
working at this age group. Yet again and again you find there are less qualified
coaches there. In Spain they have Pro Licence coaches working with the young
players, PRO LICENCE! We have coaches with a Level 1 or 2.
Gordon Taylor, the chief executive of the Professional
Footballers Association is right when he says, "there is a link between
coaching and quality. How you do internationally is a proper reflection of your
nation's youth development." And how often have we failed, how often have
expected more and the players have not performed. Yet how often do we continue
with the same way, Einstein famous quote is never more relevant to England; insanity
is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
We suffer from a distinct lack of quality coaches in this country, the stats are baffling compared to other countries; England
possess 2.769 coaches who hold Uefa B, A and the Pro Licence qualification; awards which indicate a certain quality in
coaching. Compare this to Spain where there are 23,995 and in Germany who have
34,790. The numbers do not lie, England has 10% of the quality that Spain and
Germany has. Look at the results and one cannot doubt that they have better players.
So why is England’s pool of talent so small,
why do we only produce a few real stars every generation and the rest are
merely average? I believe it has to do with how we develop talent at a young
age.
The quality of coaching at grassroots level is
abysmal and it is here that we are destroying our potential stars. You would
not get an enthusiastic volunteer to go into schools and teach English, Maths
or Science just because he watches documentaries and the science channel? So
why do we allow it with sports? In football we allow anyone to work players as
long they don’t have a criminal record, this is amazing.
How many players are being ruined by
coaches and by a culture which promotes winning over everything else and which
importantly teaches kids that mistakes are not to be tolerated and that a mistake
should never happen again? A positive
learning environment is not seen on parks on Sundays and this is where the
majority of players are, this is not a remedy for success. The pool of talent
is diminished on a weekly basis by enthusiastic volunteers who do not
understand how to teach.
What has been created are players
who are fearful of making mistakes and so end up kicking the ball long or out,
the worst thing to hear is not a coach being disappointed but in fact a
rapturous round of applause for “getting rid of it”. Anger and intimidation have
restricted and destroyed creative players, promoting instead physicality and
fight then skill and creativity.
The FA need to stand up
The FA need to invest more into grassroots;
they have improved facilities and have introduced the Skills programme, yet it
is not enough. Academies are bringing in coach education experts from outside
the FA as the FA are not doing enough. They need to invest in a large pool of coaches
who will have the skills to work with young players; having the understanding,
patience and talent to improve and develop talent. The amount of young players
from Acadmies who are released between 16-18 should be looked at and should be
put into coaching, the clubs and FA have a right to help these players and give
them opportunities to stay in football.
Until the FA support coaches working
with 7-11 players they are answerable to the poor levels of youth players in
this country. They have funded a new Wembley and a National Football Centre at
a cost of £1 billion. Is this money well spent? The NFC will not produce the amount
of players required to improve levels in this country; it will focus on a
handful of teams as before which does not address the root cause of the
problems. I believe this money should have been spent on improving coaching, Spain and Germany have invested in coaching and their success is evident. Too
much money is thrown at the tip of the iceberg which results in the same questions
and problems arising. Imagine what investment in grassroots coaching could do
for the game in this country?
The new youth modules for football
are much better than previous courses as they seek to educate coaches on how to
coach and how children learn instead of previous course which taught what to
coach. There is a big difference to having a session plan and a bag of balls to
being qualified to work with children. Until these are mandatory for every one wanting
to work with children then our youngsters will not improve.
Schools are as much to blame as the
FA for developing not just footballers but all round sports people. Why are
there not enough experts at this levels, quite simply they are not paid well
enough. The level of PE is drastically poor; the lack of expert PE teachers is
creating kids who don’t have healthy lifestyles and who lack good movements patterns. Schools just
aren’t developing children effectively, physical education is as important asother subjects yet the quality and time spent on this key subject is being
reduced not increased. The government need to address these problems and act,
funding is the key. Physical education needs to
increased and implemented in all schools with expert teachers laying the
foundations for future success. If we fail our children in primary school then
we are hindering their development for the future.
The FA need to act, need to give newly educated coaches work experience with grassroots teams in order to implement a way of playing and a style of coaching which develops creative, skilful players. Not every player will be a
professional, yet with only 1% of players from Academies becoming a pro from a potential pool of 10,000 which comes from a pool of 2.25 million kids who play football on a weekly basis , then surely there is something wrong with youth development in this country. It won’t
be overnight, it will take a decade or two, yet the FA need to do improve standards at grassroots level. The
idea of coaching needs a culture change, it needs to be viewed as an occupation
as that of a teacher not just a helpful volunteer. The FA need to do a lot to address this issue yet we also need
to do something about it, we need to stop being apathetic to this crisis and stand up against poor standards which are ruining the players in this country.
This is an outstanding article, you've absolutely hit the nail on the head and made an extremely compelling argument. The frustrating thing is that the solution appears to be relatively straight-forward and yet ignored. At least the move to smaller-sided games for kids is a major step forward but the building of the NFC does look like a terrible waste of resources (not against there being a NFC but, for example, Clairefontaine is not the reason that France has produced such good footballers in the last 25 years, just a strong part of a very strong system where the coaching of coaches is highly important).
ReplyDeleteAn excellent article but a little disparaging of experienced innovative coaches such as myself working at school and grass-roots level.
ReplyDeleteSome of the best coaches I have employed or observed possessed just a level 1 qualification, some of the worst having much higher qualifications.
This leads me to believe that life experiences, people skills and a strong player-centred philosophy are just as important as an "easily gifted" qualification.
You are completely correct in laying the blame firmly at the FA's expensively constructed doors though.
Their heirarchy and in particular their tutors/coach educators are extremely protective of their own positions, creating a glass ceiling for quality aspiring coaches to progress.
They also have a "jobs for the boys" mentality which I have witnessed closely where their "friends & associates" earn their qualifications irrespective of their participation in the courses and the quality of session content delivered.
Finally, on a topical note, Roy Hodgson's recent "robot" comment typifies much of what is wrong with our FA.
Robot tutors are producing robot coaches, individualism and innovation being condemned and frowned at.