On the night where Suarez scores four goals for Liverpool it seems fitting to discuss something which Dennis Bergkamp discusses in his book Stillness and Speed. Suarez is a fascination because he is something almost unseen in English football. He is unorthodox to say the least and has moments where he crosses the line, yet there is something remarkable about Suarez, yet as this article discusses will English football ever develop a player like him?
This week there has been some stern criticism about the English school system and how poorly it performs against other countries around the world. What is the problem? Archaic teaching methods? The acquisition of knowledge yet a lack of application? It would appear that there is a lack of modernity to the approach as well as a simple lack of hours and commitment.
The amount of hours students spend in extra studies at home and in school is paled in comparison to other nations. Quite simply there is a lack of drive, dedication and investment in learning. Therefore it is little surprise we are developing intelligent children.
This is not too far away from England’s ability to compete
with many of the top nations in regards to football. The frustration of England’s
youth development, the seeming lack of progress and of course England’s
inability to compete with the top nations, as well as those with ‘small’
populations in Holland and Belgium point to serious issues.
Where's the creativity
Perhaps the issue in both school and football is that there
is a distinct lack of creativity and freedom of expression afforded English
students. England has always been a very structured, regimented and analytical
in its approach. This is seen in the school system and which has been taken
into the world of football development.
In an excellent talk from Ken Robinson
titled “How schools kill creativity” he discusses how pupils who possess creative
flair (or for schools should I say disruptive attitudes), are attempted to
be changed to fit the norm. School he argues is a place to develop University
lecturers, and little else. The system neglects and laments creativity, much like English
football has done for decades.
Skill, expression, creativity has been looked on
negatively by an FA who valued structure, organisation and conformity. A coaching culture was developed
with these ideas and beliefs which meant England developed players whose skill
and creativity was often coached out of them.
When we wonder why we lack
players with skill then we must look at our coaching culture. It would appear
that the Academy system, which in some places (Southampton & Everton) has sought to
develop skilful and intelligent players has generally been a place where skill
is diminished.
Much like schools, players are often coached to limit their
skill and craft, coached not to try things as to not make mistakes. Academies like the school system has become a place of conformity, if you don’t
fit in with what is asked then you are released. However some of the greatest
players, the genius’ of the game were often non-conformists, they had their own
way and style. Would they make it in today’s academy structure?
And it’s not just in England. Dennis Bergkamp in his
excellent book discusses his concerns with over-coaching of players in
Academies.
If you look at the coaches we have now, they're so different. They all have their badges, and they are all very sympathetic and know exactly how to play football and what kind of exercises you should do, and for how many minutes, and the distances between the goals, and where the cones should be where you're playing positional games. And they know not to play too long - one and a half hours maximum. Maybe that's the problem. We never had that sort of attention, so we were more self-taught. Even with all the shouting, you just created your own thing.
He makes the point that this culture has produced players who
struggle to make their own decisions and when confronted with a problem of
which they have not been introduced, look to the side for answers instead of
seeking to solve it themselves.
It was really quite free for you to teach yourself. There's no shouting or military guys any more, but it's more strict in a football sense. Everything is done by the book. Is it too much? Probably. Everything is done for the kids now. They're picked up from school by mini-vans. The food is there, the teaching is there. Everything, How can they develop themselves if everything is done for them? As soon as it's a bit different it's "Oh no! I don't know what to do!" You see them looking at the bench to find out what they should do.
The unorthodox intelligence
And this is where we bring in Luis Suarez. Bergkamp makes reference to when Luis Suarez was at Ajax and how unorthodox he was. He points out that he was evidently not a product of these football schools and environments, he was raw, rugged, tenacious. He would do things to win which many coaches across Europe would perhaps not approve of.
You can see the difference with Luis Suarez when he was here (at Ajax). Of course, maybe you wouldn't agree with the things he did, but he was always trying to create something, always thinking. "How can I get the best from this situation? Do I have to pull the shirt of his defender to get in front of him? Do I get out of position to control the ball?" His mind is always busy thinking. He's very creative.
It begs the question that if Suarez had developed in one of Europe’s academies would he be the player he is now, would he even have made it? A player like Suarez has made Bergkamp reassess what Ajax is doing with their youngsters. He worries they had gone too far in over-coaching and structuring the sessions. Therefore he says;
That's one of the things we try to do with the training now in Youth - give players the chance to develop themselves into creative, special, unique individuals. We can't copy what we had in the past. Somehow we have to find a different way, so the players who come into the first team are creative again, can think for themselves, can make a difference. Be special. Be unique. That's what we want.
South American flair
Right now there is an argument as to who is the best player
in the Premier League; Suarez or Aguero. For me it is Aguero yet I love Suarez.
Both are unorthodox, skilful, creative and very effective. The fact both are
South American is not surprising. They way players develop there is very much from a street football environment.
Through futsal type games the players develop their
skills, creativity yet most importantly their intelligence and decision making.
Coaches evidently allow players to express and try things as youngsters because
the products coming out of South America possess these kind of skills.
As well as this
these players have a ruthlessness, a desire and a tenacity which although English
players are supposed to possess, they actually don’t. Why? Because it is
coached out of them in Academies.
In England they are too pampered and provided such a ‘nice’
environment in which to develop. The ‘nice’ players are those who often make
it, others not with the right ‘attitudes’ required for top level football. Yet is there not a concern
that the Academy system is simply developing one type of player, in the same
way Robinson argues the school system is there to develop simply one type of
person.
Do we not wish to be more creative with how we develop, recruit and
promote players? While we admire and envy players like Suarez, Aguero and Tevez
perhaps we should look at ways we can find and develop our own.
Solutions?
Can we replicate environments of South America? Perhaps. Yet
we cannot replicate the culture or socio-economic situations. Yet we can change our
culture to having children ‘play’. Too many are locked indoors after school and are restricted
from playing and socialising. This is only producing a sedentary, lazy and
computer focused generation.
How can young children get the hours required to
compete with their South American counterparts when they are sitting in front
of TV’s? Parents need to change their approach, not every child will become a
Suarez yet they may be fitter, socially less awkward and have a more fulfilling
childhood?
To help these kids we need to create a culture of ‘street
football’ which allows players to play and develop their own creativity and
decisions away from ‘coaches’ who make decisions for them. Investing in free
futsal courts would be a start.
As for the coaching culture, teaching skills to
players is a key part of it yet more games is key. Too many ‘nice’ practices
may look good for a coach yet these are a waste of time in developing players
skill and intelligence. Playing games with varied rules and thus problems will
allow players to think, solve and develop. Coaches therefore need to be facilitators
and guides more than “stop stand still, listen to me” coaches (products of the
FA coaching system).
As Bergkamp says this is not a problem just for England but
for Europe in general. The Western school system cannot help become part of the
football education and with the new EPPP the intention is to make the Academy
process even more structured like the school system. Whereas this may help provide
more structure there is a concern it may mean more coaching and conformity.
Will players be allowed to think, express and develop their skill and
intelligence with this increased structure? It is not to say we won’t develop
more players through this model, yet there is a concern we will develop only a
certain type of player, and a Luis Suarez type does not appear in-line with the
Academy system.
Ironic that he, like Aguero is rated so highly. We may have our
own, yet our system may disregard them. Makes you think doesn’t it.
The Whitehouse Address @The_W_Address
“The Way Forward: Solutions to England’s Football Failings”
These Football Times
Great read and agree we are not encouraging enough creativity.
ReplyDeleteGet yourself on a Practice Play football course and tell me that will not improve English football and encourage creative players.
For me PRACTICE PLAY is a fantastic course devised by Premier Skills John Cartwright & Roger Wilkinson which is all about players being encouraged to make decisions in a chaos learning environment, within game situations not 'LINES or DRILLS' as such, more "PLAY" activities structured to represent the game, where conditions and design of practices can faviour specific elements of the game the coach wants to develop
DeleteHi Gerard, are there any books on this or courses near me- I live in east Cheshire. I recently volunteered to help out with my son's U8 team and all they seem to do in training is passing drills and no practice games at all. Kids dont seem to know where to stand, what to do when it comes to the game on a Sat. This seems ideal to me - Thanks Lee
DeleteI deliver Premier Skills courses, have delivered several throughout Yorkshire! and North West, I can always come across and deliver something at your Club, if you could let others know I'd be happy to put on something at your club!
DeleteMy email is: gerard@premierskills.com cheers Gerard :)
What are academies doing today that is different from the past? Surely with all the talk about creating players with game intelligence more academies are looking at different approaches? Barcelona however do choreograph every players movement, should we be looking at doing this, what do you think?
ReplyDeleteIt was in La Castellane that Zidane had his earliest introduction to football, joining in at the age of five in football games that the neighbourhood's children played on the Place Tartane, an 80-by-12-yard plaza that served as the main square of the housing complex
ReplyDeleteIt's a good read, there are always two sides to an opinion though. The list of creative players that came through youth academy systems is also immense. CR7, Figo, Eduardo for instance I think to have awareness of all angles is important as a coach in order not to hinder a players development. less
ReplyDelete